The Effect of Work Life Balance on Turnover Intention with Self-Efficacy As a Moderating Variable on Generation Z Employees

Authors

  • Nabila Absharina Herman Wr Universitas Lampung
  • Zainnur M. Rusdi Universitas Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jempper.v4i2.4047

Keywords:

Work-life balance, Turnover intention, Generation Z, Self-efficacy, Employee retention

Abstract

This study explores the influence of work-life balance on turnover intention among Generation Z employees in Indonesia, considering self-efficacy as a moderating variable. A total of 166 respondents aged 18–27 with a minimum of one year of work experience participated in this quantitative study. Using a causal-associative design, data were analyzed through Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA) with Hayes' Process Macro Model 1. The descriptive results showed moderate levels of work-life balance and turnover intention, and a high level of self-efficacy among participants. However, hypothesis testing revealed that work-life balance had no significant effect on turnover intention, and self-efficacy did not significantly moderate this relationship. These findings imply that, for Generation Z employees in Indonesia, turnover intention may be driven by factors beyond work-life balance and self-efficacy. The study underlines the complexity of turnover behavior in this demographic and encourages organizations to consider broader strategies, such as improving career development, fostering a positive organizational culture, and enhancing job satisfaction. Further investigation is needed to identify the most influential factors contributing to turnover intention, which will help organizations retain Generation Z employees more effectively.

References

Albrecht, S. L., & Marty, A. (2020). Personality, self-efficacy and job resources and their associations with employee engagement, affective commitment and turnover intentions. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(5), 657–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1362660

An, M., Heo, S., Hwang, Y. Y., Kim, J. S., & Lee, Y. (2022). Factors Affecting Turnover Intention among New Graduate Nurses: Focusing on Job Stress and Sleep Disturbance. Healthcare (Switzerland), 10(6), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10061122

Badan Pusat Statistika. (2024). Angkatan Kerja (AK) Menurut Golongan Umur, 2024. https://www.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/2/Njk4IzI=/angkatan-kerja--ak--menurut-golongan-umur.html

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy : towards a unifying theory of behaviour change. Psychological Review, 191–215.

Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122

Bandura, A. (2008). An agentic perspective on positive psychology. (4th ed.). Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=OsjREAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA167&dq=Bandura,+A.+(2008).+An+agentic+perspective+on+positive+psychology.+In+S.+J.+Lopez+(Ed.),+Positive+psychology:+Exploring+the+best+in+people,+Vol.+1.+Discovering+human+strengths+(

Bandura, A., & Adams, N. E. (1977). Analysis of Self-Efficacy Theory of Behavioral Change’. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1(1), 287–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01663995

Bandura, A., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Gerbino, M., & Pastorelli, C. (2003). Role of Affective Self-Regulatory Efficacy in Diverse Spheres of Psychosocial Functioning. Child Development, 74(3), 769–782. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00567

Berkup, S. B. (2014). Working with generations X and Y In generation Z period: Management of different generations in business life. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(19), 218–229. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n19p218

Boamah, S. A., Hamadi, H. Y., Havaei, F., Smith, H., & Webb, F. (2022). Striking a Balance between Work and Play: The Effects of Work–Life Interference and Burnout on Faculty Turnover Intentions and Career Satisfaction. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020809

Bu, N., McKeen, C. A., & Shen, W. (2011). Behavioural indicators of turnover intention: The case of young professionals in China. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(16), 3338–3356. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.561214

Cattelino, E., Testa, S., Calandri, E., Fedi, A., Gattino, S., Graziano, F., Rollero, C., & Begotti, T. (2023). Self-efficacy, subjective well-being and positive coping in adolescents with regard to Covid-19 lockdown. Current Psychology, 42(20), 17304–17315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01965-4

Chami-Malaeb, R. (2022). Relationship of perceived supervisor support, self-efficacy and turnover intention, the mediating role of burnout. Personnel Review, 51(3), 1003–1019. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-2019-0642

Charoensukmongkol, P., & Puyod, J. V. (2024). Influence of transformational leadership on role ambiguity and work–life balance of Filipino University employees during COVID-19: does employee involvement matter? International Journal of Leadership in Education, 27(2), 429–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.1882701

Chu, H., & Kuo, T. Y. (2015). Testing Herzberg ’ s Two-Factor Theory in Educational Settings in Taiwan. 11(1998), 54–65.

Cicin, Y. (2024, June 27). Studi: Mayoritas Gen Z Incar Work Life Balance dan Jam Kerja Fleksibel. DetikEdu. https://www.detik.com/edu/detikpedia/d-7410162/studi-mayoritas-gen-z-incar-work-life-balance-dan-jam-kerja-fleksibel

Corinne, P., DiTomaso, N., & Farris F., G. (2009). Work–Family Conflict and Turnover Intentions Among Scientists and Engineers Working in R&D. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24, 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-0099089-1.

De Simone, S., Planta, A., & Cicotto, G. (2018). The role of job satisfaction, work engagement, self-efficacy and agentic capacities on nurses’ turnover intention and patient satisfaction. Applied Nursing Research, 39(May 2017), 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2017.11.004

Deloitte. (2022). The Deloitte Global 2022 Gen Z and Millennial Survey. Deloitte. https://www.deloitte.com/global/en/issues/work/genzmillennialsurvey-2022.html

Ejlertsson, L., Heijbel, B., Ejlertsson, G., & Andersson, I. (2018). Recovery, work-life balance and work experiences important to self-rated health: A questionnaire study on salutogenic work factors among Swedish primary health care employees. Work, 59(1), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-172659

Fayyazi, M., & Aslani, F. (2015). The Impact of Work-Life Balance on Employees’ Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention; the Moderating Role of Continuance Commitment. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 51, 33–41. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ilshs.51.33

Fisher, G. G., Bulger, C. A., & Smith, C. S. (2009). Beyond Work and Family: A Measure of Work/Nonwork Interference and Enhancement. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(4), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016737

Gunderman, R. (2021). The history of the work-life balance. ITP Media Group. https://www.ceo-middleeast.com/culture/464256-the-history-of-the-work-life-balance

Haar, J. M., Russo, M., Suñe, A., & Ollier-Malaterre, A. (2014). Outcomes of work-life balance on job satisfaction, life satisfaction and mental health: A study across seven cultures. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(3), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.08.010

Hair, J., Joseph., F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2018). Multivariate Data Analysis. In Mathematics of Computation (8th ed., Vol. 50, Issue 181). Cengage Learning EMEA. https://doi.org/10.2307/2007941

Hayes, A. F., & Rockwood, N. J. (2017). Behaviour Research and Therapy Regression-based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research : Observations , recommendations , and implementation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 98, 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.11.001

Jefferson, H. (2024). Employee Turnover Rates by Industry: Trends and Solutions. Awardco. https://www.award.co/blog/employee-turnover-rates

Judge, T. A., Jackson, C. L., Shaw, J. C., Scott, B. A., & Rich, B. L. (2007). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: The integral role of individual differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.107

Kaushalya, R., & Perera, G. (2018). The Impact of Work Life Balance on Employee Turnover Intention in Selected Private Banks in Colombo District, Sri Lanka. Human Resource Management Journal, 6(1), 25–34.

Lestari, D., & Margaretha, M. (2021). Work life balance, job engagement and turnover intention: Experience from Y generation employees. Management Science Letters, 11, 165–170. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.8.019

Lunenburg, F. C. (2011). Self-Efficacy in the Workplace: Implications for Motivation and Performance. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, BUSINESS, AND ADMINISTRATION, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/216507999103901202

Maru. (2016). The Everything Guide to Generation Z. Vision Critical, 51. https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/4976390/Ebooks/English ebooks/The everything guide to gen z/the-everything-guide-to-gen-z.pdf%0Ahttps://www.visioncritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/GenZ_Final.pdf

Mescher, S., Benschop, Y., & Doorewaard, H. (2010). Representations of work-life balance support. Human Relations, 63(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709349197

Meyer, J. P., & Tett, R. P. (1993). Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment, Turnover Intention, and Turnover: Path Analyses Based on Meta-analytical Findings. Personnel Psychology, 46, 259–293.

Michel, A., Bosch, C., & Rexroth, M. (2014). Mindfulness as a cognitive-emotional segmentation strategy: An intervention promoting work-life balance. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(4), 733–754. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12072

Mobley, W. H., Horner, S. O., & Hollingsworth, A. T. (1978). An evaluation of precursors of hospital employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(4), 408–414. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.63.4.408

Nazir, T., Umer, M., Najam, M., Nawab, S., Maqsoom, A., Shafi, K., Munir, Y., & Nawaz, I. (2022). Impact role stress on turnover intentions of Pakistan’s healthcare workers: Mediating and moderating role of organizational cynicism and self-efficacy. In PLoS ONE (Vol. 17, Issue 12 December). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279075

Nurdin, S., & Rohaeni, H. (2020). JKBM (JURNAL KONSEP BISNIS DAN MANAJEMEN) Work-Life Balance dan Dampaknya terhadap Intention Turnover pada Generasi Millenial : Peran Mediasi Job Satisfaction Work-Life Balance and its Impact on Turnover Intention in the Millennium: the Mediation Role of . Jurnal Konsep Bisnis Dan Manajemen), 6(2), 2020. http://ojs.uma.ac.id/index.php/bisman

Sánchez-Hernández, I., Oscar, R. G.-L., María, B.-M., & Juan, L. T.-J. (2019). Work-Life Balance in Great Companies and Pending Issues for Engaging New Generations at Work. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(5122), 1–18.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods fo Business (7th ed.). Wiley.

Thakur, A., & Kumar, N. (2015). The Effect of Perceived Organizational Support, Role Related Aspects and Work Involvement on Work-Life Balance: Self Efficacy as a Moderator. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 5(1), 1–8.

Thompson, K. R., & Terpening, W. D. (1983). Job-Type Variations and Antecedents to Intention to Leave: A Content Approach to Turnover. Human Relations, 36(7), 655–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678303600705

Yu, H. S., Lee, E. J., & Na, T. K. (2022). The Mediating Effects of Work–Life Balance (WLB) and Ease of Using WLB Programs in the Relationship between WLB Organizational Culture and Turnover Intention. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063482

Downloads

Published

2025-05-15

How to Cite

Nabila Absharina Herman Wr, & Zainnur M. Rusdi. (2025). The Effect of Work Life Balance on Turnover Intention with Self-Efficacy As a Moderating Variable on Generation Z Employees. Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen Pariwisata Dan Perhotelan, 4(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.55606/jempper.v4i2.4047