Standard Operating Procedures for Tugboat Clearance and Service Enhancement at Jepara Port

Authors

  • Rikman Sohriadhana Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen Transportasi Malahayati
  • Hidayah Hidayah Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen Transportasi Malahayati
  • Ali Sulistyo Budi Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen Transportasi Malahayati
  • Anton Novianto Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen Transportasi Malahayati
  • Paiman Paiman Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen Transportasi Malahayati

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jupsim.v4i3.5346

Keywords:

Jepara Port, Maritime Sustainability, Port Resilience, Service Quality, SOP, Tugboat Clearance

Abstract

Background: Clearance in and clearance out procedures are critical components of port operations that directly affect service quality, vessel turnaround time, and port sustainability. Jepara Port, as a regional hub, faces challenges in implementing effective clearance procedures for tugboats, notably TB. Bintang Harbour 4009, operated by PT. Sinar Bintang Samudera. Original value: Prior research has extensively examined container terminal performance and green port policies, but limited studies address tugboat clearance processes in smaller regional ports, despite their strategic role in supporting larger maritime logistics chains and sustainable port development frameworks. Objectives: This research investigates the clearance in/out procedures at Jepara Port, analyzes their influence on service quality, and evaluates whether adherence to SOPs can enhance efficiency and sustainability within the context of integrated maritime policy frameworks. Methodology: A qualitative descriptive approach was employed, using semi-structured interviews, questionnaires, direct observations, and document analysis. Data were analyzed through thematic analysis, cross-group comparisons, and narrative synthesis, incorporating sustainability assessment frameworks. Results: Findings revealed that while SOPs exist, their implementation is hindered by documentation errors, inconsistent inter-agency coordination, and partial digitalization. These issues contribute to prolonged clearance times and reduced compliance rates. However, improvements in first-time-right documentation and single-channel digital communication were shown to significantly enhance clearance performance and environmental outcomes. Conclusions: Clearance procedures are more than administrative requirements; they are strategic levers for port service quality, sustainability, and maritime vocational education. Strengthening these procedures can improve efficiency, reduce emissions, enhance port resilience, and support sustainable maritime development goals.

References

Amorim, L. M., Costa, J. L., Costa, A. C., Botelho, A. Z., & Torres, P. (2024). Unveiling microplastic abundance and distribution in an oceanic island: Offshore depository or local pollution indicator. Sustainability, 16(10), 4103. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104103

Bilal, A., Xiao-ping, L., Nanli, Z., Sharma, R., & Jahanger, A. (2021). Green technology innovation, globalization, and CO2 emissions: Recent insights from the OBOR economies. Sustainability, 14(1), 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010236

Caldas, P., Pedro, M. I., & Marques, R. C. (2024). An assessment of container seaport efficiency determinants. Sustainability, 16(11), 4427. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114427

Caldeirinha, V., Felício, J. A., Pinho, T., & Rodrigues, R. (2024). Fuzzy-set QCA on performance and sustainability determinants of ports supporting floating offshore wind farms. Sustainability, 16(7), 2947. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072947

Chae, G.-Y., An, S.-H., & Lee, C.-Y. (2021). Demand forecasting for liquified natural gas bunkering by country and region using meta-analysis and artificial intelligence. Sustainability, 13(16), 9058. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169058

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.

Du, S., Zhang, H. S., & Kong, Y. (2023). Sustainability implications of the Arctic shipping route for Shanghai port logistics in the post-pandemic era. Sustainability, 15(22), 16017. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152216017

Hilmi, N., Farahmand, S., Lam, V. W. Y., Cinar, M., Safa, A., & Gilloteaux, J. (2021). The impacts of environmental and socio-economic risks on the fisheries in the Mediterranean region. Sustainability, 13(19), 10670. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910670

Kim, B., Kim, G., & Kang, M.-H. (2022). Study on comparing the performance of fully automated container terminals during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14(15), 9415. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159415

Kim, S.-K., Choi, S., & Kim, C. (2021). The framework for measuring port resilience in Korean port case. Sustainability, 13(21), 11883. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111883

Liao, Y.-H., & Lee, H.-S. (2023). Using a directional distance function to measure the environmental efficiency of international liner shipping companies and assess regulatory impact. Sustainability, 15(4), 3821. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043821

Mwendapole, M. J., & Jin, Z. (2021). Evaluation of seaport service quality in Tanzania: From the Dar es Salaam seaport perspective. Sustainability, 13(18), 10076. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810076

Paridaens, H., & Notteboom, T. (2021). National integrated maritime policies: Vision formulation, regional embeddedness, and institutional attributes for effective policy integration. Sustainability, 13(17), 9557. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179557

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE.

Pian, F., Xu, L., Chen, Y., & Lee, S.-H. (2020). Global emission taxes and port privatization policies under international competition. Sustainability, 12(16), 6595. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166595

Qi, J., Wang, S., & Zheng, J. (2022). Shore power deployment problem—A case study of a Chinese container shipping network. Sustainability, 14(11), 6928. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116928

Wilson, T., Cooley, S. R., Tai, T. C., Cheung, W. W. L., & Tyedmers, P. (2020). Potential socioeconomic impacts from ocean acidification and climate change effects on Atlantic Canadian fisheries. PLoS ONE, 15(1), e0226544. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226544

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE.

Zhang, W., Zhang, Y., & Qiao, W. (2022). Risk scenario evaluation for intelligent ships by mapping hierarchical holographic modeling into risk filtering, ranking and management. Sustainability, 14(4), 2103. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042103

Zhou, K., Yuan, X., Guo, Z., Wu, J., & Li, R. (2024). Research on sustainable port: Evaluation of green port policies on China's coasts. Sustainability, 16(10), 4017. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104017

Zhu, J., Yan, W., He, J., Hafeez, M., & Sohail, S. (2024). RETRACTED: Exploring the convergence of ICT, digital financial inclusion, environmental pressures, and free trade and their significance in driving sustainable green investment initiatives under carbon neutrality targets. Heliyon, 10(11), e31102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31102

Downloads

Published

2025-09-10

How to Cite

Rikman Sohriadhana, Hidayah, H., Ali Sulistyo Budi, Anton Novianto, & Paiman, P. (2025). Standard Operating Procedures for Tugboat Clearance and Service Enhancement at Jepara Port. Jurnal Publikasi Sistem Informasi Dan Manajemen Bisnis, 4(3), 162–171. https://doi.org/10.55606/jupsim.v4i3.5346

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): September : Jurnal Publikasi Sistem Informasi dan Manajemen Bisnis

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Publikasi Sistem Informasi dan Manajemen Bisnis

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.