Mendekarbonisasi Negara Berkembang: Analisis Sistematis Nexus Green Government dan Green Finance dalam Mitigasi Perubahan Iklim

Authors

  • Khilman Syahputra Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri
  • Christ Valentino Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri
  • Fahri Choiri Sinaga Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri
  • Clevy Yesayas Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri
  • Arina Romaina Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri
  • Ardieansyah Ardieansyah Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri
  • Luthfi Azhari Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jupsim.v5i1.5918

Keywords:

Climate Change, Climate Finance Gap, Developing Countries, Development Economics, Green Finance

Abstract

Climate change presents a crucial development economics challenge, especially in Emerging Markets and Developing Economies (EMDEs), which face a massive climate finance gap. This article aims to systematically analyze the nexus between Green Government and Green Finance as a decarbonization solution. Using a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) methodology, this study synthesizes 52 peer-reviewed articles from Scopus and Sinta (2020-2025). Qualitative content analysis was used to map instruments, effectiveness, and implementation barriers. Findings show that the effectiveness of Green Finance instruments (e.g., Green Bonds) is empirically conditional upon a credible Green Government framework (e.g., third-party certification). However, this nexus is fundamentally broken in many EMDEs. Advanced governance instruments (like GPP and CBT) face an "implementation paradox," being too complex for low-capacity states. Analysis of innovations (like Green Sukuk in Indonesia) also identifies governance, not capital availability, as the main barrier. The article identifies a "vicious cycle": EMDEs' structural barriers (corruption, informality, low capacity) hinder effective Green Government. This governance failure prevents de-risking, causing 95% of global Green Finance to concentrate in developed nations. We conclude that policy interventions must shift from focusing on financial instruments to fixing fundamental governance preconditions.

References

Ahmad, A., et al. (2020). Green investment planning and environmental outcomes in Indonesia. Journal of Environmental Policy, 15(2), 101–118.

Ali, B., Bakhsh, S., & Yasin, M. (2019). Local governance and green finance initiatives in developing countries. Environmental Economics Review, 12(1), 55–70.

Bakry, W., et al. (2023). Is green finance really “green”? Examining the long-run relationship between green finance, renewable energy, and environmental performance in developing countries. Climate Policy, 23(4), 567–584.

Bank Indonesia. (2021). Green finance and economic stability in Indonesia. Jakarta: Bank Indonesia.

Caucheteux, K., et al. (2025). Structural barriers to green finance in emerging markets. World Resources Institute.

Climate Policy Initiative. (2025a). Global landscape of climate finance 2025. San Francisco: Climate Policy Initiative.

Climate Policy Initiative. (2025b). Green banks and sustainable finance instruments in developing countries. San Francisco: Climate Policy Initiative.

Erdapuspita, F., et al. (2025). Sustainable finance trends in Asia: A review.

Haberl, H., et al. (2020). Natural capital and sustainable development: A comprehensive review. Ecological Economics, 170, 106540.

Hickel, J., & Kallis, G. (2020). Is green growth possible? New Political Economy, 25(4), 469–486.

International Finance Corporation. (2020). Blended finance and green investment. Washington, DC: IFC.

Kahina, L., & Lamya, R. (2025). Green sukuk as a tool for sustainable development.

Liu, Y., & Song, X. (2023). Geographical bias in sustainable finance: Lessons from developed and developing countries. Journal of Sustainable Finance, 14(3), 201–220.

MDPI. (2024). Sustainable development and climate action: The state of play. Basel: MDPI.

Nugroho, H., & Pratama, D. (2022). Incentives and green investment in Indonesia.

Nuryadin, A. (2022). Barriers to green finance implementation in developing countries.

OECD. (2025a). Green government: Policy framework for sustainable development. Paris: OECD.

OECD. (2025b). Green budgeting and procurement practices. Paris: OECD.

Popkova, E., et al. (2021). Green finance and sustainable economic development. Frontiers in Environmental Economics, 9(1), 1–15.

Spash, C. (2020). Economics, ecological limits, and sustainability. Routledge.

Susanto, R., et al. (2021). Fiscal incentives and green finance adoption in EMDEs.

The Limits to Growth. (1972). A report for the Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. New York: Universe Books.

Tol, R. S. J. (2018). The economic impacts of climate change. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(4), 33–51.

World Bank. (2021). Climate budget tagging and public financial management in developing countries. Washington, DC: World Bank.

WRI. (2025). Climate finance gaps in emerging markets and developing economies. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

Zervas, E., et al. (2024). Systematic review of green bonds and sustainable finance instruments. Journal of Environmental Management, 312, 114854.

Zhang, Y., et al. (2024). Fintech and green finance: Emerging trends in EMDEs.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-05

How to Cite

Khilman Syahputra, Christ Valentino, Fahri Choiri Sinaga, Clevy Yesayas, Arina Romaina, Ardieansyah Ardieansyah, & Luthfi Azhari. (2025). Mendekarbonisasi Negara Berkembang: Analisis Sistematis Nexus Green Government dan Green Finance dalam Mitigasi Perubahan Iklim. Jurnal Publikasi Sistem Informasi Dan Manajemen Bisnis, 5(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.55606/jupsim.v5i1.5918