Efektivitas Kurikulum Kewirausahaan di Perguruan Tinggi Swasta dalam Membangun Jiwa Bisnis Mahasiswa: Tinjauan Literatur dan Strategi Pengembangan

Mahesa Vicky Satria Ramadhan Lihu; Muhammad Zainuddin

doi:10.55606/jupsim.v5i1.6310

Authors

Mahesa Vicky Satria Ramadhan Lihu Universitas Sari Mulia
Muhammad Zainuddin Universitas Sari Mulia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jupsim.v5i1.6310

Keywords:

Curriculum, Entrepreneurship, Higher Education, Learning Outcomes, Student

Abstract

The implementation of entrepreneurship curricula in higher education institutions, particularly private universities, continues to face various multidimensional challenges. Based on a review of the literature, these challenges include pedagogical aspects, infrastructure, policy frameworks, and linkages with industry. The predominance of theoretical learning approaches results in students having limited opportunities to gain practical experience in applying entrepreneurial concepts in real-world contexts. In addition, limited partnerships with industry restrict students’ access to authentic business experiences, mentorship, and broader market networks. Supporting infrastructure for entrepreneurship, such as business incubators and access to funding, remains insufficient, while higher education regulations and internal institutional policies have not been fully flexible or consistent in accommodating the dynamic nature of entrepreneurship. This study aims to analyze the alignment of the Entrepreneurship Semester Learning Plan (Rencana Pembelajaran Semester/RPS) at Universitas Sari Mulia with national curriculum standards based on Graduate Learning Outcomes (Capaian Pembelajaran Lulusan/CPL), to evaluate the structure of the RPS document, and to examine the integration of Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) activities into the entrepreneurship RPS. This research employs a descriptive qualitative method using a literature review approach and a limited case study, complemented by in-depth purposive interviews with five active students who have completed the entrepreneurship course. The findings indicate that the Entrepreneurship RPS at Universitas Sari Mulia meets national curriculum standards and demonstrates a well-structured design in terms of CPL, Course Learning Outcomes (CPMK), and active learning methods. However, aspects related to learning evaluation, academic references, and the integration of MBKM activities still require further improvement.

References

Abbas, S., de Vries, T., Shaw, S., & Abbas, S. (2007). Use and complications of peripheral vascular catheters: A prospective study. British Journal of Nursing, 16(11), 648–652. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2007.16.11.23675

Abolfotouh, M. A., Salam, M., Bani-Mustafa, A., White, D., & Balkhy, H. H. (2014). Prospective study of incidence and predictors of peripheral intravenous catheter-induced complications. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, 10, 993–1001. https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S74685

Alma, B. (2016). Kewirausahaan. Alfabeta.

Anderson, J., Greenwell, A., Louderback, J., Polivka, B. J., & Behr, J. H. (2016). Comparison of outcomes of extended dwell/midline peripheral intravenous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters in children. Journal of the Association for Vascular Access, 21(3), 158–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.java.2016.03.007

Ari, E., Triastuti, L., & Heni, S. (2010). Perbedaan teknik mendesinfeksi alkohol 70% antara cara spray dengan oles saat pemasangan infus dalam menurunkan jumlah bakteri pada site infus di RS Santo Yusup Bandung. Majalah Keperawatan Unpad, 12(1), 77–84.

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Open University Press.

Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. Harper & Row.

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x

Fayolle, A., & Gailly, B. (2015). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial attitudes and intention: Hysteresis and persistence. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12065

Hisrich, R. D. (2020). Entrepreneurship. McGraw-Hill Education.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2020). Buku panduan pengembangan kurikulum pendidikan tinggi di era industri 4.0 untuk mendukung Merdeka Belajar–Kampus Merdeka. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. SAGE Publications.

Mwasalwiba, E. S. (2010). Entrepreneurship education: A review of its objectives, teaching methods, and impact indicators. Education + Training, 52(1), 20–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911011017663

Rasmussen, E., & Sørheim, R. (2006). Action-based entrepreneurship education. Technovation, 26(2), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.06.012

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Suryana. (2017). Kewirausahaan: Kiat dan proses menuju sukses. Salemba Empat.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. (2003).

Zimmerer, T. W., & Scarborough, N. M. (2008). Essentials of entrepreneurship and small business management. Pearson Education.