Digital Catalysts: SEM Analysis of Technological Infrastructure, Entrepreneurial Ecosystems, and Economic Productivity using World Bank Data

Authors

  • Muhammad Irfan Universitas Komputer Indonesia
  • Zuli Priyanto Universitas Komputer Indonesia
  • Dedi Sulistiyo Soegoto Universitas Komputer Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jimak.v5i2.6712

Keywords:

Economic Productivity, Entrepreneurial Ecosystem, Logarithmic Transformation, Structural Equation Modeling, World Bank Data

Abstract

The transition from investment-driven to innovation-driven economies places technological infrastructure at the forefront of macroeconomic development. This study utilizes Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to analyze the complex causal relationships between technological infrastructure, the entrepreneurial ecosystem, and economic productivity across 179 economies using comprehensive World Bank data. Grounded in Endogenous Growth Theory, we hypothesize that digital infrastructure serves as a critical catalyst for entrepreneurship, which in turn drives higher economic value added and industrial output. To ensure methodological robustness, the study employs a rigorous data pre-processing approach, specifically transforming skewed variables—such as secure internet servers, patent counts, and trademark applications—into their natural logarithms (Ln) to satisfy distributional normality assumptions for linear modeling. Results derived from Jamovi analysis indicate that technological readiness significantly influences entrepreneurial capacity, which acts as a key mediator subsequently impacting GDP per person employed and industrial value added. These empirical findings suggest that policymakers must prioritize strategic digital backbone investments and secure server infrastructure to unlock the full potential of national entrepreneurial ecosystems. By bridging the digital divide, nations can foster an environment conducive to sustainable innovation and long-term economic growth.

References

Ahmad, N., & Schreyer, P. (2016). Measuring GDP in a digitalised economy (OECD Statistics Working Papers No. 2016/07). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlwqd81d09r-en

Colovic, A., & Lamotte, O. (2015). Technological environment and technology entrepreneurship: A cross-country analysis. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(4), 617–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12133

Constand, R. L., & Gilbert, A. H., Jr. (2011). E-readiness and entrepreneurship: A cross-country study of the link between technological infrastructure and entrepreneurial activity. The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 15(2), 107–129. https://doi.org/10.57229/2373-1761.1014

Firman, Karimi, S., Ridwan, E., & Rahman, H. (2024). Cross-country analysis of entrepreneurial activities: Examining the impact of entrepreneurial ecosystems and attitudes. Migration Letters, 21(S6), 100–120.

International Labour Organization. (2024). ILOSTAT database. https://ilostat.ilo.org/

International Telecommunication Union. (2024). World telecommunication/ICT indicators database.

Klapper, L., Amit, R., & Guillén, M. F. (2008). Entrepreneurship and firm formation across countries (NBER Working Paper No. 14282). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w14282

Liu, X., et al. (2024). Digital economy and environmental sustainability: Analysis of cross-country coordination. Sustainability.

Loayza, N., & Perotti, V. (2026). Business Ready (B-READY). World Bank.

Mohamed, M. M. A., Henni, M. D., & Sorour, N. A. A. (2026). Integrating digital and AI-driven productivity into national accounts: A systemic analysis of economic impacts. Sustainability, 18(2), Article 878. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18020878

Netcraft. (2024). Secure server survey.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2025). Cross-country comparisons of labour productivity levels: OECD compendium of productivity indicators 2025. OECD Publishing.

Sadenova, A., Denissova, O., Kozlova, M., & Rakhimova, S. (2025). Structural equation modeling (SEM) in Jamovi: An example of analyzing the impact of factors on enterprise innovation activity. Applied Computer Science, 21(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.23743/acs-2025-08

Ullah, S., Akhtar, P., & Zaefarian, G. (2018). Dealing with endogeneity bias: The generalized method of moments (GMM) for panel data. Industrial Marketing Management, 71, 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.11.010

United Nations. (2024). UN Comtrade database. United Nations Statistics Division.

Wang, Z., Peng, D., Kong, Q., & Tan, F. (2025). Digital infrastructure and economic growth: Evidence from corporate investment efficiency. Economic Modelling, 142, Article 106932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2024.106932

World Bank. (2024a). Methodology handbook (2nd ed.): World Bank entrepreneurship survey.

World Bank. (2024b). World development report 2024: Economic growth in middle-income countries. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-2114-1

World Bank. (2025). Digital progress and trends report 2025: Strengthening AI foundations.

World Intellectual Property Organization. (2024). WIPO statistics database.

Zhu, T. J., & Cruz, M. (2023). Developing entrepreneurial ecosystems for digital businesses and beyond: A diagnostic toolkit. World Bank.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-03

How to Cite

Muhammad Irfan, Zuli Priyanto, & Dedi Sulistiyo Soegoto. (2026). Digital Catalysts: SEM Analysis of Technological Infrastructure, Entrepreneurial Ecosystems, and Economic Productivity using World Bank Data. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan, 5(2), 366–372. https://doi.org/10.55606/jimak.v5i2.6712