Analisis Faktor Penyebab Fraud dengan Model Heptagon dan Strategi Audit Internal pada PT XYZ
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jimak.v5i3.7976Keywords:
Audit Internal, Fraud, Fraud Heptagon, Gioia Methodology, Internal ControlAbstract
This study aims to analyze the factors contributing to fraud at PT XYZ, a building-material distribution company, using the Fraud Heptagon framework and to formulate an internal audit strategy for fraud prevention and detection. The study employed a qualitative case-study design. Data were obtained through semi-structured interviews, field observations, and documentation, and were analyzed using the Gioia Methodology through first-order concepts, second-order themes, and aggregate dimensions. The findings indicate that fraud risk at PT XYZ is associated with pressure, rationalization, opportunity, capability, collusion, stimulus, and ego/arrogance, although the empirical strength of each element differs. Opportunity emerges strongly through excessive user authority, gaps in daily monitoring, manual sales transactions, delayed system entry, and weaknesses in reconciliation. Capability is reflected in employees’ experience and knowledge of business processes and systems, while collusion is related to close sales-customer relationships and reliance on trust without sufficient independent verification. The study further finds that internal audit should adopt a more proactive and risk-based approach through periodic monitoring, onsite audits, cross-branch cross-checks, SOP education, follow-up of findings, sanctions, and legal coordination. The study contributes an empirical understanding of fraud risk in a multi-branch distribution context and links Fraud Heptagon factors directly with internal audit responses.
References
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2022). Occupational fraud 2022: A report to the nations. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners.
Azizan, A. F., & Ali, M. M. (2024). The effect of internal control mechanism towards fraud prevention in small and medium enterprises. Indonesian Journal of Sustainability Accounting and Management, 8(1), 178–188. https://doi.org/10.28992/ijsam.v8i1.843.
Azizah, S., & Reskino. (2023). Pendeteksian fraudulent financial statement: Pengujian Fraud Heptagon Theory. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Governance, 4(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.24853/jago.4.1.17-37.
Bonrath, A., & Eulerich, M. (2024). Internal auditing's role in preventing and detecting fraud: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Auditing, 28(4), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12342.
Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people's money: A study in the social psychology of embezzlement. Free Press.
Djami, R. A., & Murtanto. (2024). Factors that influence Fraud Heptagon Theory on financial statements fraud: Empirical study on the mining sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2018–2022. Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management, 4(1), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.59141/jrssem.v4i1.701.
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151.
Joshua, A. A., Alao, O., & Ige, O. E. (2023). Fraud theories and global cybercrime during the COVID-19 pandemic: The Extended S.C.O.R.E.E Model. International Journal of Research Science & Management, 10(10).
Khoyumi, K., Puspa Inggani, A., & Hadiyati, S. N. (2024). Detecting financial statement fraud using the Hexagon Fraud Theory approach in financial sector companies. Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management, 4(2), 226–242. https://doi.org/10.59141/jrssem.v4i2.695.
Lonto, M. P., Sukoharsono, E. G., Baridwan, Z., & Prihatiningtias, Y. W. (2023). The effectiveness of internal audit for fraud prevention. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 17(3), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v17i3.11.
Lubis, H. Z., Sari, M., Ramadhany, A. A., Ovami, D. C., & Brutu, I. R. (2024). Effect of internal audit, internal control, and audit quality on fraud prevention: Evidence from the public sector in Indonesia. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 22(2), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(2).2024.04.
Pamungkas, I. D., & Irwandi, S. A. (2025). Detecting fraudulent financial reporting: Heptagon fraud model. The Indonesian Accounting Review, 14(2), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.14414/tiar.v14i2.4523.
Raihan, M. R., Pamungkas, I. D., Setiawanta, Y., & Mardjono, E. S. (2024). Impact of whistleblowing system between the Vousinas Fraud Hexagon Theory and financial statement fraud. Maksimum: Media Akuntansi Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang, 14(1), 114–135. https://doi.org/10.26714/mki.14.1.2024.114-135.
Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing theory of fraud: The S.C.O.R.E. model. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2017-0128.
Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The fraud diamond: Considering the four elements of fraud. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–42.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





