The Influence of AHTS Vessel Maintenance on Operational Efficiency at Pertamina Marine Solutions

Authors

  • Harmuzan Harmuzan Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen Transportasi Malahayati
  • Dapot Diaman Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen Transportasi Malahayati
  • Mardiana Mardiana Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen Transportasi Malahayati
  • Boy Laksmana Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen Transportasi Malahayati
  • Ihram Wiratantri Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen Transportasi Malahayati

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jupsim.v4i3.5348

Keywords:

AHTS Vessel Maintenance, Maritime Human Resources, Maritime Logistics, Operational Efficiency, Spare Parts Management

Abstract

This research investigates how maintenance of Anchor Handling Tug Supply (AHTS) vessels and the availability of spare parts affect operational efficiency in Pertamina Marine Solutions’ Transko Andalas activities. Using a qualitative approach, the study engaged maritime experts, engineers, and operational supervisors to identify essential determinants of vessel performance and continuity. Data collection was conducted through semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, and thematic analysis, which provided insights into maintenance issues and their direct implications for daily operations. The findings show that operational efficiency improves significantly when preventive maintenance is carried out consistently and supported by reliable spare parts availability. Conversely, delays in spare parts procurement, shortages of skilled technical staff, and gaps in maintenance expertise are found to weaken vessel reliability. The study makes an important contribution to the field of maritime transportation management by offering practical, evidence-based maintenance guidelines and emphasizing the importance of developing human resources for specialized offshore support vessels. In addition, the research highlights several practical measures, including the establishment of stronger maintenance systems, the provision of comprehensive training for technical personnel, and the optimization of supply chain strategies to ensure timely spare parts readiness. These implications provide valuable direction for enhancing operational performance and sustainability within the Indonesian maritime sector, particularly in complex offshore support operations where efficiency and reliability are critical.

References

Caldas, P., Pedro, M. I., & Marques, R. C. (2024). An assessment of container seaport efficiency determinants. Sustainability, 16(11), 4427. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114427

Caldeirinha, V., Felício, J. A., Pinho, T., & Rodrigues, R. (2024). Fuzzy-set QCA on performance and sustainability determinants of ports supporting floating offshore wind farms. Sustainability, 16(7), 2947. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072947

Carter, A., Lee, F., & Taylor, B. (2024). Enhancing the operational efficiency of marine vessel main engine systems through cost reduction via reliability techniques. Ayden Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 12(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13850877

Du, S., Zhang, H. S., & Kong, Y. (2023). Sustainability implications of the Arctic shipping route for Shanghai port logistics in the post-pandemic era. Sustainability, 15(22), 16017. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152216017

Ginting, N., Trisno, R. J., & Ruminda, M. S. (2025). The effect of ship maintenance management, crew competence and supervision on the smooth distribution of oil and gas mediated by ship reliability. Ranah Research: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 7(4), 2373–2390. https://doi.org/10.38035/rrj.v7i4.1497

Kim, B., Kim, G., & Kang, M.-H. (2022). Study on comparing the performance of fully automated container terminals during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14(15), 9415. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159415

Kim, S.-K., Choi, S., & Kim, C. (2021). The framework for measuring port resilience in Korean port case. Sustainability, 13(21), 11883. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111883

Liao, Y.-H., & Lee, H.-S. (2023). Using a directional distance function to measure the environmental efficiency of international liner shipping companies and assess regulatory impact. Sustainability, 15(4), 3821. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043821

Mwendapole, M. J., & Jin, Z. (2021). Evaluation of seaport service quality in Tanzania: From the Dar Es Salaam seaport perspective. Sustainability, 13(18), 10076. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810076

Paridaens, H., & Notteboom, T. (2021). National integrated maritime policies (IMP): Vision formulation, regional embeddedness, and institutional attributes for effective policy integration. Sustainability, 13(17), 9557. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179557

Pian, F., Xu, L., Chen, Y., & Lee, S.-H. (2020). Global emission taxes and port privatization policies under international competition. Sustainability, 12(16), 6595. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166595

Qi, J., Wang, S., & Zheng, J. (2022). Shore power deployment problem—A case study of a Chinese container shipping network. Sustainability, 14(11), 6928. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116928

Sobirin, Y., Mudjiardjo, A., Sahil, A., Sonny, I., & Malisan, J. (2022). The effect of monitoring and employee coordination on procurement of main engine spare part for operational continuity of vessels. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6363687

Zhang, W., Zhang, Y., & Qiao, W. (2022). Risk scenario evaluation for intelligent ships by mapping hierarchical holographic modeling into risk filtering, ranking and management. Sustainability, 14(4), 2103. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042103

Zhou, K., Yuan, X., Guo, Z., Wu, J., & Li, R. (2024). Research on sustainable port: Evaluation of green port policies on China's coasts. Sustainability, 16(10), 4017. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104017

Downloads

Published

2025-09-10

How to Cite

Harmuzan, H., Dapot Diaman, Mardiana, M., Boy Laksmana, & Ihram Wiratantri. (2025). The Influence of AHTS Vessel Maintenance on Operational Efficiency at Pertamina Marine Solutions. Jurnal Publikasi Sistem Informasi Dan Manajemen Bisnis, 4(3), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.55606/jupsim.v4i3.5348