Protokol Pemeriksaan Mental pada Pelaku Pembunuhan dan Implikasinya dalam Investigasi Forensik

Authors

  • Syahla Marsellita Wahyudi Universitas Mataram
  • Annisa Salmaadani Syafitri Universitas Mataram
  • Fiza Afifah Universitas Mataram
  • Insan Anshori Umma Universitas Mataram
  • Lale Nandita Hulfifa Universitas Mataram
  • Kezia Michella Yusak M Universitas Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/klinik.v5i3.7445

Keywords:

Criminal Profiling, Forensic Psychology, Homicide, Mental Examination, Psychological Assessment

Abstract

Homicide cases involve complex legal, social, and psychological dimensions that require comprehensive investigation procedures. Besides collecting physical evidence, understanding the mental condition of offenders is essential to identify motives, behavioral patterns, and the extent of criminal responsibility. This study aims to examine the contribution of mental examination protocols in supporting homicide investigations from a forensic psychological perspective. A literature review approach was employed by analyzing relevant scientific publications discussing homicide, forensic assessment, psychological evaluation, and offender profiling. The review indicates that homicidal behavior may emerge from the interaction of personal, social, environmental, and psychological factors. Various assessment methods, including personality testing, structured and semi-structured interviews, affective disorder evaluation, neuropsychological assessment, memory examination, and trauma-related assessment, are frequently utilized to obtain a comprehensive understanding of an offender’s mental state. The findings suggest that mental examination not only assists in evaluating psychological functioning but also contributes to criminal profiling and legal decision-making. The integration of forensic psychological assessment into homicide investigations may strengthen the objectivity of investigative processes and provide a broader understanding of factors underlying violent criminal behavior.

References

Bhushan, D., & Kumar, U. (2023). The psychological autopsy: An overview of its utility and methodology. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 65(Suppl. 2), S308–S314.

Budisetyani, I. G. A. P., Herdiyanto, Y. K., Marheni, A., Tobing, D. H., Astiti, D. P., Rustika, I. M., & Supriyadi. (2016). Bahan ajar psikologi forensik. Universitas Udayana.

Cholidah, D. (2023). Peran hakim dalam memperkokoh integritas peradilan sebagai pemenuhan kepercayaan publik. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i, 10(2), 627–646. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v10i2.32134

Conner, K. R., Chapman, B. P., Beautrais, A. L., Brent, D. A., Bridge, J. A., Conwell, Y., et al. (2021). Introducing the psychological autopsy methodology checklist. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 51(4), 673–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12738

Crisan, R. M., Muntean, M., Vesa, C. M., et al. (2021). Psychological Autopsy and Forensic Considerations in Completed Suicides during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Applied Sciences, 11(23), 11547. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311547

Darma, I. M. W., & Nikijuluw, B. (2019). Psikolog forensik sebagai salah satu proses pemidanaan. Binamulia Hukum, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v8i2.74

Eastman, N., Adshead, G., & Fox, S. (2018). Forensic Psychiatry, Forensic Psychology and Criminal Justice. Oxford University Press.

Jain, I., Mahapatra, O., & Kumar, Y. (2025). Minds after death: The expanding role of psychological autopsy in investigations: A review. Journal of Forensic Science Research, 9(2), 155–161.

Johal, G., Appleby, L., & Turnbull, P. (2024). Is there still a place for psychological autopsy in suicide research? International Review of Psychiatry, 36(4–5), 494–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540261.2024.2378075

Khabibah, S. U., Ula, M. R., & Mahojwala, G. (2022). Psychological autopsy: Future implementation in Indonesia? Forensic Sciences International: Mind and Law, 3, 100107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsiml.2022.100107

Prem, A., Satheesh, A., Devananda, K. P., & Sahay, M. (2024). Exploring the prevalence of psychological autopsy in Indian context. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, 18(2).

Rahmawati, D., & Pusvitasari, P. (2021). Peran psikologi forensik dalam melakukan investigasi dan penanganan pada kasus pembunuhan. Buletin K-Pin, 7(24).

Rassin, E. (2022). Context effects in forensic psychological assessment. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.952136

Riza, K., Lubis, I. H., & Suwalla, N. (2022). Kepastian hukum terhadap putusan peradilan adat Aceh dalam penyelesaian tindak pidana pencurian. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 2(1).

Sablone, S., Bellino, M., Cardinale, A. N., Violante, M. G., Risola, R., Magno, A., Pierro, V., & Grattagliano, I. (2024). Psychological autopsy: A powerful tool in forensic investigations. Forensic Sciences, 4(4), 635–646. https://doi.org/10.3390/forensicsci4040044

Sinaga, M. R. (2024). Implementing forensic psychology to assess criminal responsibility in criminal investigations. DIH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 20(2).

Sudrajat, & Yusuf, H. (2025). Psikologi forensik dalam pembuktian tindak pidana pembunuhan berencana. Jurnal Intelek dan Cendikiawan Nusantara, 2(3), 3770–3777.

Sulmustakim, A. (2019). Kedudukan psikologi forensik dalam penanganan pelaku tindak pidana pembunuhan dengan kekerasan terhadap anak. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(2).

Syam, D. R., Baskoro, B. D., & Sukinta. (2017). Peranan psikologi forensik dalam mengungkapkan kasus-kasus pembunuhan berencana (Relevansi metode lie detection dalam sistem pembuktian menurut KUHP). Diponegoro Law Journal, 6(4).

UNODC. (2023). Global Study on Homicide 2023. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-06

How to Cite

Syahla Marsellita Wahyudi, Annisa Salmaadani Syafitri, Fiza Afifah, Insan Anshori Umma, Lale Nandita Hulfifa, & Kezia Michella Yusak M. (2026). Protokol Pemeriksaan Mental pada Pelaku Pembunuhan dan Implikasinya dalam Investigasi Forensik. Jurnal Ilmiah Kedokteran Dan Kesehatan, 5(3), 370–378. https://doi.org/10.55606/klinik.v5i3.7445