Analisis Hubungan Kesesuaian Tema Debat dengan Personal Qualities dalam Debat Calon Gubernur dan Calon Wakil Gubernur Kalimantan Barat
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/inovasi.v4i3.4783Keywords:
Political-Debate, Personal-Qualities, ThemesAbstract
This study aims to analyze the relationship between the suitability of the debate theme and the personal qualities of the candidates in the 2025 West Kalimantan gubernatorial and deputy governor debates. Using a quantitative approach and content analysis method, data was obtained from the debate transcript which was then encoded based on the level of relevance of the theme and indicators of personal qualities. The chi-square test is used to measure the relationships between variables. The results of the study show that there is a significant relationship between the suitability of the theme and the public perception of the candidate's personal qualities. Debate themes that are relevant to the candidate's background or experience tend to reinforce judgments of qualities such as empathy, integrity, and communication skills. These findings emphasize the importance of planning appropriate debate themes to showcase the candidate's leadership qualities more authentically and credibly in front of the public.
References
Al Hamoud, A., Hoenig, A., & Roy, K. (2022). Sentence subjectivity analysis of a political and ideological debate dataset using LSTM and BiLSTM with attention and GRU models. Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences, 34(11), 7974–7987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2022.07.014
Beeri, I. (2025, May 20). Who suffers the most? Wild boars, perceived harm, and local politics: Governance challenges in urban human-wildlife conflicts. Cities.
Bogen, E., & Åm, H. (2025, May 21). Closing facilities or closing debates? Knowledge politics in sustainable aquaculture governance. Marine Policy.
Calliari, E., Serdeczny, O., & Vanhala, L. (2020, July 21). Making sense of the politics in the climate change loss & damage debate. Global Environmental Change.
Chai, M. S. (2015, March 23). Personality and leadership qualities among student leaders. American Journal of Applied Psychology.
Duthie, R., Budzynska, K., & Reed, C. (2016). Mining ethos in political debate. In Computational Models of Argument.
Hamoud, A. A., Hoenig, A., & Roy, K. (2022, July 19). Sentence subjectivity analysis of a political and ideological debate dataset using LSTM and BiLSTM with attention and GRU models. Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences.
Jain, A., & Sharma, R. (2021). Leaders’ personal wisdom and leader–member exchange quality: The role of individualized consideration. Journal of Business Ethics, 173(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1692-4
Kasa, R., Salam, A. O., & Basir, B. (2023). Leadership qualities and service delivery: A critical review of literature. FAIA Journal, 6(3), 641–650.
Kashif, F., Farooqi, R., Tariq, S., Nusrat, A., Ashraf, F., & Raees, A. (2022, August 26). A transitivity analysis of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump’s third presidential debate. Heliyon.
Koga, H., Bouzarovski, S., & Petrova, S. (2024, October 8). Unsettling mainstream academic debates on community-based energy governance: Exploring the Japanese experience. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
Lauri, M., Carbin, M., & Linander, I. (2023, June 1). The rise of carceral feminism in Sweden: Analysing political debate and policy on men’s violence against women. Women's Studies International Forum.
Malik, A. A., Shafiq, M., Sharif, A., & Nguyen, D. K. (2023). Public acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine: Role of communication strategies and personal credibility of spokesperson. Vaccine, 41(25), 3871–3879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.05.021
Michaud, L., Kolla, G., Rudzinski, K., & Guta, A. (2024, April 19). Mapping a moral panic: News media narratives and medical expertise in public debates on safer supply, diversion, and youth drug use in Canada. International Journal of Drug Policy.
Revolusi, P. R. (2024, Maret 1). Persepsi publik dan media sosial dalam kampanye digital Pilpres 2024. Nivedana Jurnal Komunikasi dan Bahasa, 5(1).
Richter, K. (2024, October 23). Cosmological limits to growth, affective abundance, and Rights of Nature: Insights from Buen Vivir/sumak kawsay for the cultural politics of degrowth. Ecological Economics.
Rigii, G. P. (2017, June). Leadership qualities and service delivery: A critical review of. Saudi Journal of Business and Management Studies, 2(6).
Rismanto, & Yulianita, N. (2024, November 30). Analisis wacana komunikasi verbal pada debat pertama calon gubernur dan calon wakil gubernur Jawa Barat 2024. ArtComm, 7.
Salman, A., Majid, A. H. A., & Ahmed, R. R. (2020). Personality and leadership qualities among student leaders. South Asian Journal of Business and Management Studies, 10(2), 150–165.
Sonnsjö, H. (2024, February 25). What we talk about when we talk about electricity: A thematic analysis of recent political debates on Swedish electricity supply. Energy Policy.
Svärda, P.-A. (2021, September 11). Fetal and animal research in Sweden: The construction of viable lives in regulatory policy debates, 1970–1980. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science.
Tamrin, S. H., Sajidin, M., Rakasiwi, F., & Ulfa, M. (2025, Maret 13). Meningkatkan kesadaran politik pemuda dalam menghadapi Pilkada 2024 di Kabupaten Majene. Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat, 10.
Trilling, D. (2016, May 9). Two different debates? Investigating the relationship between a political debate on TV and simultaneous comments on Twitter. Social Science Computer Review.
Verjovsky, M., Barreto, M. P., Carmo, I., Coutinho, B., Thomer, L., Lifschitz, S., & Jurberg, C. (2023, July 30). Political quarrel overshadows vaccination advocacy: How the vaccine debate on Brazilian Twitter was framed by anti-vaxxers during Bolsonaro administration. Vaccine.
Walker, M. A., Anand, P., Abbott, R., E, J., Tree, F., Martell, C., & King, J. (2012, January 4). Classifying stance in online political debate: That’s your evidence?
Wiksten, S. (2024, March 19). How laws are interpreted can make a positive difference in de-normalizing violence: Revisiting the Hart-Dworkin debate. Social Sciences & Social Sciences.
Zacher, H., Pearce, Z. K., Rooney, D., & McKenna, B. (2013, March 24). Leaders’ personal wisdom and leader–member exchange quality: The role of individualized consideration. Journal of Business Ethics.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
