Analysis of the Effectiveness of Material Selection for Riverside Stabilization Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method
Case Study: PT. Tondano Nusajaya Mine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jeei.v5i3.5865Keywords:
Cost Efficiency, Installation Speed, Retaining Wall Materials, Riverbank Protection, Structural StrengthAbstract
This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of retaining wall construction materials for riverbank slopes at PT. Tambang Tondano Nusajaya, Likupang, North Minahasa, using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. The analysis was conducted on three alternative materials geocell concrete, wiremesh concrete, and reinforced steel based on three criteria: structural strength, cost efficiency, and installation speed. The AHP results indicated geocell concrete as the selected material with the highest global priority score of 0,624, excelling in installation speed 0,480 and cost efficiency 0,405, while reinforced steel and wiremesh concrete obtained lower scores of 0,164 and 0,213, respectively. The findings suggest that although reinforced steel possesses high structural reliability, operational considerations regarding time acceleration and cost optimization are more dominant in this project context. Geocell Concrete is recommended as the most effective and efficient solution for riverbank retaining wall material application at the study location, with an important note regarding the necessity of further investigation concerning long-term performance and adaptation to local environmental conditions.
References
Aswarni, N. R., & Hermawan, C. (2025). Analisis laju erosi pada Daerah Aliran Sungai (DAS) Mudik Lombu Desa Logas Kecamatan Singingi Kabupaten Kuantan Singingi. Jurnal Planologi dan Sipil, 7(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.36378/jps.v7i2.4663
De Oliveira, P. H. S., Neves, S. M., Sant’Anna, D. O., Oliveira, C. H., & Carvalho, H. D. (2019). The analytic hierarchy process supporting decision making for sustainable development: An overview of applications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 212, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.215
Dehghanian, F., Mansour, S., & Karimi, B. (2012). A multiobjective optimization model for project selection and scheduling using AHP. International Journal of Production Economics, 158, 123–135.
Fauzi, W. A., Romadhon, M. Z., & Simbolon, F. H. (2017). Implementasi AHP dalam sistem pendukung keputusan pemilihan karyawan terbaik. Jurnal Informatika, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.31937/sk.v10i1.887
Handayani, H., & Angreni, L. (2020). Penerapan metode AHP dalam memilih penyedia layanan internet. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi, 6(2), 182–191.
Koerner, R. M. (2012). Designing with geosynthetics (6th ed., Vol. 1–2).
Leal, J. E. (2020). AHP-express: A simplified version of the analytical hierarchy process method. MethodsX, 7, 100748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.11.021
Martini, R. A. S. (2019). Pengaruh kecepatan aliran sungai terhadap erosi tanah pada lereng di belokan Sungai Enim Desa Karang Raja Ka-bupaten Muara Enim. Jurnal Bearing, 5(4), 266–273. https://doi.org/10.32502/jbearing.1678201854
Oetomo, D. S., & Susanto. (2011). Sistem pengambilan keputusan. Jurnal Informatika, 7(3), 234–245.
Saaty, T. L. (2000). Models, methods, concepts and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1665-1
Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
Setiawan, H., & Ariadi. (2012). Penerapan metode AHP dalam pengambilan keputusan. Jurnal Sistem Informasi, 8(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.21609/jsi.v18i1.1142
Shvetsova, O. A., Rodionova, N. O., & Epstein, E. (2021). Evaluation of investment projects under uncertainty: Multi-criteria approach using interval data. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 8(4), 914–928. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2021.8.4(55)
Sianturi, G. (2011). Seleksi material menggunakan metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dan Pugh. Proceedings of Industrial Research Workshop and National Seminar 2011, Politeknik Negeri Bandung, 182–186.
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2020). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (Rev.). Alfabeta.
Supriadi, A., Rustandi, A., Komarlina, D. H. L., & Ardiani, G. T. (2018). Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP): Teknik penentuan strategi daya saing kerajinan bordir. Deepublish Publisher.
Tantyonimpuno, R. S., & Retnaningtias, A. D. (2006). Sistem pendukung keputusan berbasis AHP untuk pemilihan jenis pondasi. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 13(1), 1–12.
Tanubrata, T., & Setiaputri, V. (2019). Penerapan metode AHP dalam penentuan strategi manajemen proyek. Jurnal Manajemen Konstruksi, 11(2), 89–102.
Tominanto. (2012). Metode pengambilan keputusan multi-kriteria. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 9(2), 156–171.
Utami, S., Ekasari, K., & Saputra, R. M. (2021). Penggunaan AHP guna penentuan prioritas penanganan permukiman tangguh bencana longsor. Jurnal Pengelolaan Lingkungan Berkelanjutan, 4(2), 498–512. https://doi.org/10.36813/jplb.4.2.498-512
Yu, D., Xu, Z., Wang, W., & Liang, S. (2023). Application of multi-criteria decision making methods in construction: A systematic literature review. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 29(3), 281–303.
.png)
.png)
