Aplikasi Model Anatomi Cetak Tiga Dimensi dalam Pendidikan Anatomi Panggul: Tinjauan Sistematis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/klinik.v5i3.7650Keywords:
3D Printing, Anatomy Simulation, Female Pelvic Anatomy, Learning Media, Obstetrics EducationAbstract
Three-dimensional printing is an emerging educational tool that can enhance anatomy learning through realistic and interactive models. However, evidence regarding the use of female pelvic anatomy models in anatomy education has not yet been comprehensively synthesized. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines, using PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect as of June 15, 2026, to identify primary studies published between 2021 and 2026. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall, the synthesis results indicate that 3D-printed models improve anatomical visualization, spatial understanding, student engagement, and satisfaction. Experimental studies also reported improved fracture classification, understanding of injury mechanisms, and procedural skills, particularly among students with limited clinical experience. Furthermore, these models provide a more hands-on learning experience, allowing students to understand the relationships between anatomical structures more clearly, and support a more effective learning process compared to conventional media. However, most of the studies were exploratory in nature, had small sample sizes, and reported heterogeneous outcomes. 3D-printed anatomical models show promise in the education of female pelvic anatomy, but further high-quality experimental studies are needed to confirm their educational effectiveness.
References
Al-Rubaie A. From cadavers to codes: the evolution of anatomy education through digital technologies. Med Sci Educ. 2024;35(2):1101-1109. doi:10.1007/s40670-024-02268-6.
Asghar A, Naaz S, Patra A, Ravi KS, Khanal L. Effectiveness of 3D-printed models prepared from radiological data for anatomy education: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of 22 randomized, controlled, crossover trials. J Educ Health Promot. 2022;11:353.
Brechter C, et al. Developing a realistic and cost-effective training model (MaiSurge) for laparoscopic hysterectomies to train and assess surgical skill. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2026.
Brumpt E, Bertin E, Tatu L, Louvrier A. 3D printing as a pedagogical tool for teaching normal human anatomy: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23:871. doi:10.1186/s12909-023-04865-4.
Burgade V, Bonnevialle P, Mansat P, et al. Use of 3D printing as a simulation tool for trauma surgery of the pelvis. 3D Print Med. 2021.
Chan JYK, Yam A. Three-dimensional printed anatomical models as an educational tool for orthopaedic surgical trainees: a single institution experience. J Orthop Surg. 2025.
Chatha WA. From scalpel to simulation: reviewing the future of cadaveric dissection in the upcoming era of virtual and augmented reality and artificial intelligence. Cureus. 2024;16(10):e71578. doi:10.7759/cureus.71578.
Johnson M, Davis B, Guillot G, Brueckner-Collins J, et al. Creating a novel 3D-printed model for teaching pelvic floor anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2025;18(11):1196-1202. doi:10.1002/ase.70101.
Kiesel M, Beyers I, Kalisz A, Joukhadar R, Wöckel A, Herbert SL, Curtaz C, Wulff C. A 3D printed model of the female pelvis for practical education of gynecological pelvic examination. 3D Print Med. 2022;8:13. doi:10.1186/s41205-022-00139-7.
Standring S, editor. Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. 42nd ed. London: Elsevier; 2020.
Using three-dimensional printing in the teaching and learning of human anatomy: an integrative literature review. Res Soc Dev. 2023;12(9):e12712943270. doi:10.33448/rsd-v12i9.43270.
Wang C, Stöckle U, Dong S, Meng C, Tong F, Ling Z, Back DA. Experience-stratified efficacy of 3D printed models in assisting orthopedic residents with pelvic ring injury classification: a comparative analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2025;20:1073. doi:10.1186/s13018-025-06479-4.
Ward S, Maresse S, Sun Z. Three-dimensional-printed models: a novel approach to ultrasound education of the placental cord insertion site. Appl Sci. 2025;15(15):8221. doi:10.3390/app15158221.
Yan M, Huang J, Ding M, Song D, et al. Three-dimensional printing model enhances correct identification and understanding of pelvic fracture in medical students. J Surg Educ. 2023;80(4). doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.12.014.
Ye Z, Dun A, Jiang H, Bai S, Wang T, Zhai J, Yi S. The role of 3D printed models in the teaching of human anatomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20:335. doi:10.1186/s12909-020-02242-x.
Yuen J. What is the role of 3D printing in undergraduate anatomy education? a scoping review of current literature and recommendations. Med Sci Educ. 2020;30:1321-1329. doi:10.1007/s40670-020-01031-2.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aqsha Wijaya, Ahmad Azwar Habibi, Novia Martin, Fakhriati Averroesyka

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





