Exploring the use of Automated Application in Writing Activities: University Students’ Experiences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/inovasi.v5i1.4966Kata Kunci:
Writing, AWE, Automated writing evaluation, EFL Writing, Writing technologyAbstrak
Abstract : This study explores the experiences of university students in using Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) tools during English writing activities. Using a qualitative case study approach, five EFL university students were observed and interviewed to examine how they interact with AWE systems, particularly Quillbot, and how they perceive its role in their writing development. The finding revealed that students utilized AWE for grammar correction, vocabulary enhancement, paraphrasing, and idea generation. While the tools were generally perceived as helpful in improving writing accuracy and fostering independence, participants also expressed concerns about over-reliance on automated feedback and the potential erosion of personal writing style. These findings underscore the importance of using AWE critically and in combination with self-reflection and human feedback to support more effective and autonomous writing practices.
Keywords: Automated Writing Evaluation; EFL Writing, Student Perceptio;, Self-directed Learning; Writing Technology
Referensi
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Link, S., Mehrzad, M., & Rahimi, M. (2022). Impact of automated writing evaluation on teacher feedback, student revision, and writing improvement. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(4), 605–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1743323
Lim, F. V., & Phua, J. (2019). Teaching Writing with Language Feedback Technology. Computers & Composition/Computers and Composition, 54, 102518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2019.102518
Mohamad Nasri, N., Halim, L., & Abd Talib, M. A. (2020). Self-directed learning curriculum: Students’ perspectives of university learning experiences. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 17(2), 227-251.
Palermo, C., & Thomson, R. (2018). AWE in higher education: Student engagement and revision strategies. Journal of Writing Analytics, 2, 85–114.
Parra, G., & Calero, C. (2019). The impact of AWE tools on L2 writing: A comparative study using Grammarly and Grammark. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 8(4), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.8n.4p.96
Rahimi, M., & Zhang, L. J. (2018). Writing anxiety and metacognitive awareness in EFL learners. System, 76, 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.05.002
Roscoe, R. D., Allen, L. K., Johnson, A. C., & McNamara, D. S. (2018). Automated writing instruction and feedback: Instructional mode, attitudes, and revising. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 62(1), 2089–2093. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931218621471
Stevenson, M., & Phakiti, A. (2019). Automated feedback and second language writing. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues (pp. 125–142). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635547.009
Wang, H., Yu, S., & Luo, Z. (2020). Effects of AWE feedback on student revisions in academic writing. Assessing Writing, 44, 100454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100454
Wilson, J., & Czik, A. (2016). Automated essay evaluation software in English Language Arts classrooms: Effects on teacher feedback, student motivation, and writing quality. Computers & Education, 100, 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.004
Wu, L., & Halim, H. B. A. (2024). Task complexity and foreign language writing emotions as predictors of EFL writing performance. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1323843
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Jurnal Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
